Baldur's Gate 3 Free [Spoilers]: To Free or Not to Free, That is the Question!

Should you actually free [spoilers]?

The question at hand is whether it is actually a good idea to free [spoilers]. Let's delve into the various perspectives on this matter.

One argument in favor of keeping [spoilers] imprisoned is that Vlaakith, the current ruler of the githyanki, acts as a restraining force, preventing them from becoming too powerful and posing a threat to the world. However, what if Vlaakith's quest for godhood succeeds? In that case, she would need more living followers to become stronger, potentially surpassing the ambitions of even the Dead Three. So, the argument that she is the better option becomes less convincing.

On the other hand, some players argue that freeing [spoilers] is not as dangerous as it seems. The epilogues suggest that he considers the player a friend and shows no inclination to follow in his predecessors' footsteps. Additionally, the rebellion against Vlaakith is already happening and progressing well, regardless of whether [spoilers] lives or dies. The major impact of this choice is on Lae'zel, who becomes more patriotic and leads the rebellion under [spoilers], or lives for herself and eventually joins the rebellion on her own terms.

Moreover, it is worth noting that [spoilers]'s political views align more closely with the githzerai than his own mother's. He seeks to mend the ideological rift between the two nations, reaching out to the githzerai for diplomatic negotiations. This presents an opportunity for peaceful coexistence and potential alliances, rather than immediate conflict.

Furthermore, [spoilers] is not your typical githyanki. He is a monk, unlike the majority of githyanki who are fighters. His appearance, with a beard and smooth ears, is more in line with the Githzerai fashion. The only real connection he has to the githyanki is being the son of Gith and having the symbol of Vlaakith on his chest, which could have been stolen by Vlaakith herself. So, freeing [spoilers] might not necessarily empower the githyanki as feared.

Lastly, from both an idealistic and realpolitik point of view, there are arguments for freeing [spoilers]. Lae'zel, who has been positively influenced by the player's journey, can become one of the leaders of the rebellion. She has gained a deeper understanding of life beyond conflict and war, and with [spoilers] by her side, they can work towards a more balanced and harmonious future for the githyanki.

In conclusion, the decision to free [spoilers] is not a straightforward one. While there are valid concerns about the potential consequences, there are also compelling arguments for taking the risk. Ultimately, it is up to the player to weigh the pros and cons, consider the impact on the world and the characters involved, and make a choice that aligns with their own beliefs and goals.

Related Articles

Unleashing the Unspeakable: A Guide to the Great Old One Warlock in Baldur's Gate 3

R Baldur's Gate 3: Why This Role-Playing Game is a Must-Play for Every Gamer

Baldur's Gate 3: Jiggling Physics or Stable Adventures? A Guide to Navigating the Jiggly Waters

Spore Druid Shenanigans in Baldur's Gate 3: Unleashing the Power of Nature in Honor Mode

Baldur's Gate 3 Builds: Unleash Your Inner Untouchable and Leave Enemies Scratching Their Heads!